Tokenizer fairness in 2026

The same sentence costs more tokens in some languages than others — you pay more, wait longer, and fit less context. This reproduces the NeurIPS 2023 finding and asks: three years on, did the gap close?

Following Petrov et al. (2023), the premium of a language is how many tokens its text needs relative to English for the same content (FLORES-200, parallel sentences). Premium 1.0 = as cheap as English; 15 = fifteen times more expensive. Lower is fairer.

The 2026 leaderboard

Latest tokenizer from each lab, ranked by median premium across languages (the typical language's cost). mean and the tail (p90, worst 10%) show how the low-resource languages fare. GPT-4's 2023 tokenizer is shown as the baseline.

Every language, every tokenizer

Premium for all FLORES-200 languages. Click a column header to sort; type to filter. Cell colour = premium.

What the numbers say

Method & reproduction

Every number here is reproducible. premium(L) = Σ tokens(L devtest) / Σ tokens(English devtest), no special tokens, over the FLORES-200 devtest split.

Reproduction & extension of Petrov, La Malfa, Torr, Bibi — “Language Model Tokenizers Introduce Unfairness Between Languages” (NeurIPS 2023). Generated 2026-07-08. Data: FLORES-200. Not affiliated with the paper's authors or any model provider.